yuehancn/dsh-tool-protobuf ↗★ 0

dsh-tool-protobuf

免安装protoc直接读取、审计和对比Protobuf定义文件。 适合在接口开发中需要AI辅助阅读、比对和校验结构体定义的用户。

包名
dsh-tool-protobuf
兼容性
待验证
Harness 依赖范围
>=0.2.0-rc.2
Cordis 依赖范围
~4.0.4
版本
0.1.0
许可证
MIT
最近更新
2026年10月2日

安装

$npx -p @deepseek-ai/dsh dsh plugin --profile web add github:yuehancn/dsh-tool-protobuf

dsh-tool-protobuf

Read, audit and diff Protocol Buffer definitions from chat — without installing protoc.

Most .proto work in an agent loop is reading, not compiling: what is in this file, what changed between these two versions, is this number free, did anyone reuse a field number. A compiler is the wrong tool for all four — it answers "does this compile", which is rarely the question, and it needs a toolchain you may not have on the machine you are standing on.

This plugin parses the .proto grammar in-process. No protoc, no Python, no network, no external dependency.

Install

dsh plugin --profile  link /path/to/dsh-tool-protobuf

Then set where it is allowed to read from — workDir is a boundary, not a hint:

# in your profile's cordis.patch.yml
- id: tool-protobuf
  config:
    workDir: C:/work/my-service/proto

The six tools

ToolThe question it answers
protobuf_statusIs a real protoc on this machine, and what .proto files exist under workDir?
protobuf_outlineWhat is in this file — syntax, package, imports, and the shape of everything declared.
protobuf_describeWhat is in this one message or service — every field with its number, type and wire cost; every RPC with its streaming shape and gRPC path.
protobuf_diffWhat changed between v1 and v2 — classified breaking / risky / additive.
protobuf_auditWhat is wrong with this file that a compiler would have let through.
protobuf_next_numberWhich field numbers are free here, or is this number safe to use.

Why protobuf_diff is the reason to install this

The wire format is keyed by field number, not by name. That single fact is behind almost every protobuf incident:

  • Rename a field, keep the number → old data still decodes. Harmless.
  • Rename a field, change the number → the name still matches, the bytes do not. Old data lands in a different field, or nowhere.
  • Delete a field without reserving its number → the next person reuses it for a different type, and old data is silently reinterpreted as garbage.
  • Change int32 to string at the same number → the bytes are read as the wrong type.

protobuf_diff names each of these instead of leaving you to spot them:

verdict: incompatible (8 breaking, 1 risky, 5 additive)
  [breaking] type-changed: field amount_minor (2) changed type int64 -> string
  [breaking] number-reused: field 9 was "total_minor" and is now "line_items_summary" — old clients will decode new bytes into the old field
  [breaking] field-added: new field customer_detail = 14 lands in a previously reserved range
  [breaking] number-changed: field "total_minor" moved from 9 to 30 — the name is the same but the wire format is keyed by number, so old data no longer decodes into it
  [breaking] field-removed: field currency = 10 removed but 10 was NOT reserved — reserve it now or it will be reused
  [risky]    field-removed: field due_at = 6 removed and its number is reserved; consider reserving the name too
  [additive] field-added: new field currency_display = 20

Every message is written to be actionable. number-reused says what will happen, not just that a number collided. field-removed distinguishes a safe removal (number reserved) from a future corruption bug (number left free) — and tells you to reserve it.

Why protobuf_audit catches what the compiler will not

protoc accepts plenty of definitions that are technically legal and practically a trap:

broken.proto: 10 errors, 4 warnings
  [error] Dup.b: field number 1 is already used by "a"
  [error] Dup.c: field number 19005: 19000-19999 is reserved by protobuf itself
  [error] Dup.d: field number 0: below 1
  [error] Dup.e: field number 536870912: above 536870911 (2^29-1)
  [error] ReservedClash.bad: field number 5 is declared reserved in this message
  [error] BadMap.nope: map key type "bytes" is not allowed
  [error] BadMap.dangling: map value type "MissingType" is not a scalar and is not defined in this file, and the file imports nothing
  [error] NoZero: proto3 enums must have a zero value (the default)
  [error] Aliased.ALIASED_B: enum value 0 duplicates "ALIASED_A"
  [warn] Gappy: unused field numbers 2 sit below the high-water mark 3 and are not reserved — a future edit may reuse one and break compatibility

The warn line is the one worth reading: a gap below the high-water mark means somebody deleted a field without reserving it, and the next change to that number is a data corruption bug waiting for a release. Note that a message with a wide gap reports the gaps summarised in one finding, not one line per number — a file with 4,095 holes produces one warning, not 4,095.

Independent verification

The honest problem with a hand-written parser is that it can agree with itself. This plugin's test suite is therefore gated on a second opinion from a compiler nobody here wrote:

$ PROTOC_PYTHON=/path/to/python-with-grpcio-tools node _test/run-all.mjs
independent compiler: C:/Users/.../python.exe

PASS  test-logic.mjs           # tests 71  # pass 71  # fail 0
PASS  test-integration.mjs     # tests 33  # pass 33  # fail 0
PASS  test-e2e.mjs             # tests 9   # pass 9   # fail 0

all suites passed

The e2e suite asserts two things against the real protoc: that it accepts every well-formed fixture this parser accepts, and that it rejects the deliberately-broken one. Both directions matter — a parser that accepts everything passes the first test alone.

That oracle caught a real bug during development: billing-v2.proto had line_items_summary = 9 while also declaring reserved 9, which this parser accepted and protoc rejected. The parser was lenient; the fixture was wrong. Only the outside opinion could tell which.

Without PROTOC_PYTHON the oracle tests report a diagnostic and skip — and run-all.mjs prints which mode it ran in, because a green run with the oracle skipped is a weaker result and that difference should not be invisible.

What this plugin does not do

  • It does not compile. No descriptor sets, no code generation, no wire encoding. protobuf_status tells you whether a real protoc is available so you can shell out for that.
  • It does not resolve imports. An import is reported as a name; a type defined in another file is reported as unresolvable rather than guessed. The alternative is a parser that invents types.
  • It reads one file at a time. protobuf_diff takes two paths, not two trees.

Safety

workDir is enforced by taking only the final path segment of a caller-supplied path and discarding everything before it. That is stricter than rejecting .., and it is deliberate: a drive letter survives a naive segment filter, so C:/tmp/work + C:\Windows\System32\config\SAM resolves to a reachable path and leaks the file. Only the last segment is honoured, so a caller names a file and never a location.

Files larger than 8 MB are refused rather than parsed.

License

MIT